A Response to Tony Blair: “Iraq Did Not Cause 7/7”

Tony Blair is a man that has gained a reputation comparable and equally as divisive as Margaret Thatcher. He has certainly become one of Britain’s most contentious Prime Ministers of the past decade and was the acting PM at the time of the 7/7 bombings. At the time of the attack, Britain was engulged in a war in Iraq which not only cost the UK tax payer £9.24bn, it has also led to the crippling of Blair’s career as one of the poorest foreign policy initatives. Today he has offered his own verdict on the events in July 2005 – that they were not caused by the campaign in Iraq.

This is a bold statement by Blair to say the least. Blair’s claim that there was not a correlation between Iraq and 7/7 dramatically overlooks the relationship that Islamic extremists have with conflicts concerning Muslim populations. It is the humanitarian fallouts of such conflicts which extreme Islamists capitalise on as evidence that the Islamic faith is being undermined by the West. This was a relationship overlooked by Blair today in his statement, and One would assume this was a deliberate and calculated move aiming to limit the criticism of his premiership.

Blair in Iraq. Western coalition forces invaded the country in 2003.
Blair in Iraq. Western coalition forces invaded the country in 2003.

The campaign itself left 1.6 million Iraqi’s displaced, totalling 5.5% of the population whilst aerial bombardment devastated the economic hubs of Baghdad and Nasiriyah leaving rife levels of unemployment. The incompetent process of disbanding Saddam’s military forces further left the country in chaos with many of these former generals orchestrating the atrocities performed by ISIS in their Iraq and Syrian campaigns. The conflict initiated a vast socio-economic vacuum that became an ample target for radicalisation and these are the issues that Britain is currently facing in 2015.

****

Islam is a faith centred around community, which is otherwise known as the ummah. The ummah, like many aspects of Islam, has a moderate and an extremist interpretation; a moderate sees it as their peaceful responsibility to contribute to the well-being of the ummah, whereas an extremist enacts their responsibility through a process of violence and terror. It is an interpretation divided by charity and peace against terrorism and bloodshed.

The campaign in Iraq exemplifies the bipolar interpretation of the ummah. Extremists advocate the implementation of violence to defend their brethren in other Muslim regions, and continuously reference the people of Palestine, Bosnia, and Checnya as being oppressed in their homeland by their respective governments; the governmental policies of Britain, America and Israel are also bluntly seen as imperialistic, believing that their agendas are the annihilation of Islam entirely.

A memorial to the Srebrenica massacre of Bosnian Muslims in 1995. It is seen as exemplifying Muslim victimisation.
A memorial to the Srebrenica massacre of Bosnian Muslims in 1995. It is seen as exemplifying Muslim victimisation.

Blair has blindly ignored this rationale which incorporates the campaign in Iraq as well as others as examples of western domination. These are conflicts that are repeatedly referenced through social media and in the propaganda efforts of Islamic fundamentalists who have successfully manipulated fellow Muslims in the past to carry out attacks on the London tube and the Madrid train network.

The crucial point to remember is that these conflicts have transnational implications. The Afghan war against the Soviets saw an influx of Saudis and Egyptians to fight against Russian imperialism; moreover, the U.S invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 witnessed an exodus of Checnyans, Egyptians, Syrians, and Iraqis all of whom were battle-hardened and felt it was their responsibility to expel the infidel. The conflict involving ISIS today is no different and has in fact reached farther afield and recruited Muslims on our own European doorstep.

The wreckage of a bus that was blown up as part of the attack on July 7th 2005.
The wreckage of a bus that was blown up as part of the attack on July 7th 2005.

The terrorists who detonated the bombs in London in July 2005 were most definitely acting in the same fashion, with Iraq and Afghanistan being some of their main grievances. Their mujahideen brothers were suffering from the decimation of their livelihoods and businesses, whilst also losing family members to relentless drone attacks and armed shoot outs; the fanatics can only have interpreted these events as absolute evidence of their unquestionable duty to protect their Islamic brothers and sisters against western aggression. The 7/7 attack which culminated with the death of 52 Britons therefore was a retaliation for the losses endured by the Muslim community – there had been 3,977 Iraqi civilian deaths in 2003 alone following the invasion and the terrorists were simply responding to this catastrophe by murdering innocent Britons.

***

Tony Blair may have been saving face today with his comments on 7/7, and he was most probably trying to absolve himself of the horrors which have surfaced from this illegal campaign. Blair, who has been recently labelled a war criminal, obviously has every interest in disassociating the 7/7 bombings from his foreign policy excursions.

“This is a global problem… we’re not going to allow anyone to excuse themselves by saying that the slaughter of totally innocent people is somehow a response to any decision made by any government.” – Tony Blair on 7/7

Isolating the London tube bombings and divorcing them from the Iraq war clearly is inaccurate, however. Why would Lee Rigby be considered a legitimate target, other than the fact that he was a representative of the British armed forces which is held responsible by Islamic fundamentalists for the devastation and social depravity in Iraq following the British and American invasion.

Toppling of the statue of Saddam Hussein. The invasion was sparked by a belief Saddam was developing nuclear weapons. This allegation was later proven false.
Toppling of the statue of Saddam Hussein. The invasion was sparked from a belief Saddam was developing nuclear weapons. This allegation was later proven false.

The Iraq campaign eventually claimed the lives of between 9,7461-106,348 civilian deaths and figures such as these will remain a prominent point of reference for jihadists when choosing to commit atrocities. To the fanatics, these Iraqis were ultimately victims of a western imperialist attempt to dominate and subvert the Iraqi Muslim community.

When someone so senior as Tony Blair, who was the Quartet’s Special Envoy to the Middle East, fails to recognise the rationale behind modern Islamic terrorism, it leaves the public with nothing but apprehension as to how the current crisis in Iraq will be resolved. His comments are misguided and ignorant of the reality of the Middle East today and its relationship to transnational Islamic terrorism.

But then again, it is not in his interest to argue otherwise.

***

Here is the link to Tony Blair’s statements which I came across on the Independent. http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/this-is-what-tony-blair-has-to-say-on-the-10th-anniversary-of-77–ZkUwWHuFGx

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s